Home
What does religion got to do with it?

In Pastor Kelly Boggs recent article that appeared on NewsWithViews.com he suggested, tongue 'n cheek, that if the Ten Commandments displayed in the Alabama court house of Judge Roy Moore had been displayed with a 'nude Moses chiseled into its side' then it might have been permitted to stay.

I believe that a great many other people would have found this artistic expression more than a little objectionable, yet, his point is well taken. This is not a question of religious freedom but rather a question of free expression of ideas or 'freedom of speech'. No one has a right to force their religious beliefs on anyone whether this was a Christian nation at one time or not.

The issue here is freedom of expression which falls under 'freedom of speech' not religion. The Ten Commandments is not the exclusive document or property of any particular religion. Moslems, Christians, including all of the many Protestant denominations, Eastern Orthodox, Catholics, Jews as well as dozens of other religious groups claim it.

It is also clearly a major part of the history of mankind and the history of law. People have referred to them as basic guidelines in good government for centuries. They have every much a right in any public building as a display or expression of ideas as does the Magna Charta or the Hammurabi Codes.

The religionists out declaring their religious freedom and trying to prove that the United States is a Christian nation are following the strategy of a bull in a bull ring. While charging the red cape of the ADL and atheists they remain completely off point. They do not understand what the Ten Commandments was.

The fact is those Ten Commandments were the foundation Laws for a nation not a religious doctrine. Three million people1 had just been liberated by this guy named Moses who had been a prince and military leader in Egypt. They had left the jurisdiction of the Egyptian government, its courts and its laws. For centuries they had been a subject citizenry2 in a controlled economy, all the gold and silver was kept in the government treasuries, with fiat usurious currency being loaned into circulation by their financial institutions called temples. Abortion had become common along with the break down of the family unit and the people had to work almost 3 months out of every year just to pay their tax liability to an unresponsive administration.

Once free of such a corrupt and oppressive system of government they needed some rules by which to live together as a nation. They needed rules that would keep them strong as a people and keep some new despot from seizing power. Moses is reported to have brought down these ten laws written on stone from the mountain.

For four hundred years this nation lived and governed themselves according to these laws and a few hundred statutes without any central top down authoritarian government. This system outlawed murder, robbery and even attempted robbery, strengthened and guarded the family, which was the foundation of society and formed a national networking community of charity, trust and mutual defense. With these Ten Commandments as the center of their legal system they survived as a nation in a hostile world and thrived. The Ten Commandments were no different in purpose than the Twelve Tablets of Rome displayed in the center Forum of their government.

A public display of the Ten Commandments is the expression of ideas fundamental to national laws and has nothing to do with the prohibition of congress in respecting the establishment of religion because the Ten Commandments isn't about religion. Because someone turns something into a religious icon or doctrine in their own minds does not make it taboo to mention. Freedom of speech is not freedom of speech 'if you don't talk about religion'. Freedom of speech is freedom of speech.

If there is any power or right anywhere in the government to remove that monument then all religious books in public libraries should be removed. The Bible, Koran, the Bagavatagita must be band along with any other symbol remotely connected with what is called religion.

The Rank of God

I suggest we start with the Capitol Rotunda where Constantine Brumidi depicted "George Washington rising to the heavens in glory" surrounded by Greek gods. On the government web site concerning this expression of free speech it is stated that the title of the painting "The Apotheos of Washington" "means literally the raising of a person to the rank of a god".3

That seems pretty religious to me and I am willing to loan some paint scrapers to the Supreme Court in order to begin removal of those religious icons from public display in the Capitol Dome.

The problem in this controversy lies at least in part with the ignorance of religious zealots who do not understand the Bible or the Gospel of Jesus Christ. According to the introduction to John Wycliffe's translated 1382 Bible, "This Bible is for the Government of the People, by the People, and for the People." But like Christ he was thrown in jail. He mysteriously died there. Later the State Church dug his body up and burned it at the stake.

Why was he so hated by the establishment? Not just because he translated an old book into English but because he realized the simple fact that Israel was a government not a religion and that Jesus preached a government that was within your reach and not a religion where only the dead are rewarded. He had realized that worshiping was not just about repeating prayers, displays of devout zeal and singing. He realized the Bible was about governments, the good the bad and the ugly.

If the religious Churches would get their head out of the clouds and see the true nature of the gospel that preached the "kingdom of God is come nigh unto you" they might not find themselves subject to a Supreme Court that exercises the assumed authority to suppress free expression of ideas.

The First Amendment says, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances." This does not give the Judiciary the power to muffle the free expression of the people and their ideas or their history or even the exercise of free thought on law and government.

Maybe if the People will take a closer look at Brumidi's painting in Capitol dome in Washington and why anyone would think that raising Washington "to the rank of god" is not an establishment of religion then they might be able to get beyond the red cape they think is the problem and finally make contact with the source of their irritation.

The fact is George Washington was the first Apotheos of the United States and George Bush is the present one and for that fact so was George the III in his day. Apo Theos can be translated literally "Appointor of Gods" but what does it mean?.

The emperors of Rome4 were called 'gods' too, using the words Apo Theos. This was not because anyone believed that they created heaven and earth. Apo Theos was an office of government. They were the appointors of judges and magistrates of the judiciary..

Augustus was the first Apo Theos of Rome. He also held the office of Emperator which is commonly translated "Commander in chief" and the office of President called Principas Civitas, "First Citizen". He was actually elected to those offices by an electoral college under constitutional limitations, for a term of years and was required to run for regular reelection with a campaign platform.

So, who were these gods that Augustus and the Georges appointed in their respective governments. In the Old Testament the words "gods" and "God" are translated from the single word 'elohiym in the plural. 'Elohiym is defined "rulers, judges" and "occasionally applied as deference to magistrates" while in the New Testament the word God is translated from the Greek word theos which figuratively means "a magistrate." Check your Strong's Concordance.5

The term god as it was used every day at the time the Bible was written simply means anyone who has the right to "exercise judgment" over you or the law that you are under, the appointed judges. Once this basic fact sinks in the whole Bible should be read in a new light.

Abraham, Moses and Jesus were talking about government not just religious doctrines. These men often conflicted with governments, left them or were willing to live in them but not of them.

Why? Because these men spoke about the way the people could rule themselves without the need for a strong central government that often became corrupt and despotic. They knew that if you gave power to men, e.g. made them gods, to exercise authority6 over you they would almost always become corrupt and "steal your rights through ambuscade".

Judge Moore is a 'lesser god' who is told what to do by higher gods, 'the gods men have chosen for themselves' [Judges 10:14]. The Supreme Court is a panel of gods and the President of the United States is an Apo Theos, Appointor of Gods, just like Augustus Caesar. All this is made possible and is dependent on a series of oaths taken by these men. Of course if the Churches were preaching the Gospel of Jesus Christ the people would know that he forbade the taking of oaths. [Mt 5:34-37, Jas 5:12]

If the Churches were to wake up to what the Bible is saying they would realize what kind of government Jesus the King appointed in Luke 22:29 when he said, "And I appoint unto you a kingdom, as my Father hath appointed unto me".

When they went out and preached that kingdom7, as he told them to do, they would be constantly warning the people as he did in Luke 22:25 "...The kings of the Gentiles exercise lordship over them; and they that exercise authority upon them are called benefactors. But ye shall not be so:.."

Yes, if the United States was really a Christian government it would look less like the government of Rome and more like the government Christ preached and told us to preach. Is it any wonder that the first Appointor of Gods for the United States said, "The United States is in no way founded upon the Christian religion"?

Yes, those men may have had some Christian principles when they created the United States Government8. One of the most popular Presidents of Rome, Marcus Aurelius, voiced many Christian principles in his "Meditation" and his hope to return to "the Republic", but he still persecuted Christians on a regular basis even though religious freedom was guaranteed by the Roman Constitution which he affirmed religiously.

Why did he persecute those Christians? Because Christianity was not about religions. It was another type of government. Christians did not participate in the entitlement programs of the Roman Benefactor because they had a system based on Faith, Hope and Charity not a system of mandatory and accounted contributions, penalties and guaranteed benefits.

They did not apply to or pray to the Fathers in Rome9 but depended upon brotherly love and their Father in Heaven who lives in the hearts of each man of the kingdom. They did not call any "man on earth father" as Jesus instructed. You see all the Senators and congressmen of Rome were called "father" and the emperor was called the Patronus Romanus, Our father who art in Rome.

No, the Ten Commandments is not about religion. It is a government document. It is a founding document of "the Government of the People, by the People, and for the People."

But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you. Mt 6:33

Peace be on your house

Gregory

Http://www.hisholychurch.net/subscribe.html

Go To Top Next Back

"The Kingdom News List"

Email:

Sub  

Unsub

To ORDER materials click here


1 Chapter 3 Gibbon's Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire
To navigate without frames use links below

Home

Search Outline Subscribe About Purpose Mission Ministry Polity Creed
Contact Study News Outreach Preach Locate

Kingdom News Intro Series

Google
Search WWW Search hisholychurch.net


1Worship http://www.hisholychurch.net/sermon/worship.html

2 Enslave http://www.hisholychurch.net/study/gods/eve.htm

3 The Apotheos of Washington http://www.hisholychurch.net/sermon/apotheos.HTM

4 Rome vs US http://www.hisholychurch.net/sermon/romeus.HTM

5 There are gods many http://www.hisholychurch.net/sermon/theosgod.HTM

6 The prime directive http://www.hisholychurch.net/study/polity/articlex.html

7 Kingdom at hand http://www.hisholychurch.net/study/kingdom/1kifthen.HTM

8 The Constitution http://www.hisholychurch.net/news/4dconstitution.html

9 Call no man Father http://www.hisholychurch.net/sermon/father.HTM