|
The Covenants of the gods
The contractual nature of governments of the world
 Democracy
(A chance for the mob to choose.)
vs.
Demagogue
(The choice of the mob.)
“For several
hundred years after the early 8th century BC many of the city-states of Greece were republican in form. Carthage
was likewise a republic for more than 300 years until its destruction
by the Romans in 146 BC.
For nearly 500 years Rome itself was a republic in which virtually
all free males were eventually franchised. One of the oldest extant
republic is the state of San Marino on the Italian Peninsula, about
225 km (about 140 mi.) north of Rome. According to tradition, it was
established as a republic in the second part of the 4th century AD.” There are many kinds, types and examples of Republics and Democracies
in the world today but the oldest has been kept a secret for to long.
On first examination it
does not seem that a Republic in itself is beneficial to freedom or a
particularly benign form of government, that is if you used The Union
of Soviet Socialist Republics or The Peoples Republic of China as
your model and yardstick for the measurement of individual freedom in
a Republic.
Those examples are
countries whose constituency resides in a Communist regime within
there respective Republics. This fact as well as there social history
and custom may have led to their present state. Now, the Soviet Union
is supposedly no more and Russia has become a democracy of sorts
within and under their present government that still operates within
the original Russian Republic. Even China is now moving in its own
inscrutable way toward democracy but only within the authority and
restrictions of its laws, society and historical custom.
All this, while America
seems to becoming a more restrictive society with less and less
individual freedoms. “Those who already walk submissively say
there is no need for alarm. But submissiveness is not our heritage.
The first Amendment was designed to allow rebellion against
usurpation to remain as our birthright. The Constitution was designed
to keep government off the backs of the people.... The aim was to
allow men to be free and independent and to assert their rights
against government… The America once extolled as the voice of
liberty heard around the world no longer is cast in the image which
Jefferson and Madison designed, but more in the Russian image…”
There is a distinct
difference between a Democracy and a Republic. Although a republic
may use a democratic vote to choose its representatives, who exercise
a specified and restricted authority, the sovereignty rest in the
hands, heart and head of the individual constituent. A Democracy on
the other hand is a pooling of rights of all sorts which are vested
in the majority who rule collectively or through their leaders who
are elected. The Democracies power to regulate, tax and dominate may
be limited by a contract or constitution, but the constitution may be
expanded in scope by a larger consensus of the voters.
A
democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of
the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine.
The original American
colonies were Republics. “Our forefathers, inhabitants of the
island of Great Britain, left their native land, to seek on these
shores a residence for civil and religious freedom:”
In a republics the
State (status, estate… resting in the rights of the freeman)
is independent of its government. A freeman was free from civil
authority and religiously allowed to accept or reject his God as
King. The word republic was used because those early pilgrims and
separatists knew its origins. It is a shortened form of the Latin
idiom “Libera res Publica” meaning “free from
things public.” The heads of the government were “titular”
in authority, meaning they held authority “in name only.”
“Government is
not sovereignty. Government is the machinery or expedient for
expressing the will of the sovereign power… This sovereign
power in our government belongs to the People, and the government of
the United States and the governments of the several states are but
the machinery for expounding or expressing the will of the sovereign
power… But it must be remembered, under our government, all
sovereign power is lodged in the People; and the government, by its
different departments, can exercise only such power as has been
delegated to it by the People. None of these delegated powers can be
by the government delegated to someone else. They are only granted to
the government to be in proper cases exercised by it, and not to be
given to another to be exercised by that other… Because
neither congress nor the treaty making power can grant away the
sovereign powers of the government, but they can only exercise them
for the People to whom they belong.”
It is important to
realize that in a Republic the sovereign power is not collective but
individualistic. It rests in the individual Patriarchs of each family
unit. The Family is the essential building block of a True Theocratic
Republic. Undermined the family and you undermine the Republic.
From its first
inception the Republic was under attack but it was in the second
century of its existence that the United States, a democracy within
the Republic was able to make some of its greatest advancements by
the greatest inroads against the Family.
In the 1928 U.S. Army
Training Manual attempted to define democracy and therefore defines
an earlier American perception of a democracy:
“DEMOCRACY:
A government of the masses. Authority derived through mass meeting or
any form of direct expression. Results in mobocracy. Attitude toward
property is communistic - negating property rights. Attitude toward
law is that the will of the majority shall regulate, whether it is
based upon deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice, and
impulse, without restraint or regard for consequences. Results in
demagogism, license, agitation, discontent, anarchy.”
In June 1952 “The
Soldiers Guide” contained the following definition and changing
attitude:
“Meaning
of democracy: Because the United States is a democracy, the majority
of the people decide how our government will be organized and run -
and that includes the Army, Navy and AirForce. The people do this by
electing representatives, and these men and women carry out the
wishes of the people.”
If Samuel made it clear
that it was evil for Israel to desire a ruler, king, judge, e.g.
Sovereign, other than God Himself over them, then how much more evil
is it for the collective citizens of the US to desire to be that sovereign over each and every citizen within
that created jurisdiction?
Under
a democratic government, the citizens exercise the powers of
sovereignty; and those powers will be first abused, and afterwards
lost, if they are committed to an unwieldy multitude.
In those early days we
were called a republic. Today the United States is called a federal
democracy, “democracy” being mob rule and ”federal“
from the French word for feudal. But has the seat of the authority of
government changed. Are we still a republic? The Declaration of
Independence only made American republics independent from that
limited authority remaining in the hands of the king, do to our
charters and his usurpation. It was the king who revolted against the
law of the contract, the charters, by the attempted “usurpation”
“to seize a use” not justly his. He was not unlike the
pharaoh of old who tried, on the shores of the Red Sea, to
unlawfully, though unsuccessfully, withdraw consent already given to
those God fearing Israelites preparing to serve the LORD
of lords.
“I
believe in the United States of America as a government… whose
just powers are derived from the consent of the governed: a democracy
in a republic.”
In the story “A
Tale of Two Alamos” Hutton refers to “Travis’ line in the dust” as
“that sublime moment of democratic choice.” As the story
goes William Barret Travis gave his men a choice of leaving or
staying to fight a ”hopeless“ battle. All the men stayed
but one Louis Rose who climbed the wall and escaped to tell the story
and open a meat market in Nacogdochea. When asked why he didn’t
stay his reply was “By God, I wasn’t ready to die.”
If he had been given a
democratic choice he would have been compelled to stay by the will of
the mob. It would have been both a sublime act of democracy and his
last. Fortunately, it was a sublime moment of Individual choice in
the Republic of Texas that allowed Rose to live.
So, a democracy is a
kind of common purse of rights. Even though the democracy may exist
within a Republic it may grant duties and privileges that may be
legally incumbent upon its members. In a democracy the president may
not be titular and the State may not be separate from its government.
One would be more likely to be electing their leaders rather than
mere representatives.
BUSINESS 1. n. business, occupation, employment, employ…
Employ ”Equitable conversion.“
Just
as the individual republican state governments were established to
continue their work legislating the remedies in equity and business
that were not available at the common law so also was the articles of
confederation and the constitution established by those states to
take over the limited responsibilities and privileges that had
defaulted from the hands of the king and his parliament.
“It
is easy to escape business, if you will only despise the rewards of
business.”
The
repugnance of Equity, Mercantilism and Commercial laws, which are not
law but followed the law and became the law through contract, were at
the core of the motivating spirits of the Separatists, pilgrims and
Quakers who risked all for a residence of civil and religious freedom
on these shores. They had become almost untaxable except for tariffs
on foreign trade and excise tax upon the ‘uses’ not held
in fee-simple. Since the common law was not regulated by statute then
the legislature created by the Constitution for the United States did
not appear to be the threat to individual freedom, rights and
responsibility that it has become. Who could have known what twists
and turns and metamorphosis this system and society would take in the
years to follow.
Cast in thy lot among
us; let us all have one purse: My son, walk not thou in the way with
them; refrain thy foot from their path: For their feet run to evil,
and make haste to shed blood. (Pr. 1:14,16)
The
Constitution of the United States was simply an agreement between
individual governments which were only republics with little dominion
or authority over the people. It was generally an unpopular agreement
and had it been important enough to be put to a vote it would have
never been past. What did those people see and understand to find the
constitution so objectionable that we do not?
“If
we abide by the principles taught in the Bible, our country will go
on prospering, but if we neglect its instruction and authority, No
man can tell how soon a catastrophe may overcome us, and bury all our
glory in profound obscurity.”
Citizenship of or in
government as a person, as opposed to Natural Citizenship as an
inhabitant, is a privilege granted or denied and regulated by a
government created according to the rules established by that
government. If an individual wishes to join and become a person in a
legal society and be governed by the rules of that society’s
government then he is legally bound to abide by the rules of that
created society. He bars himself from his own liberty and becomes a
surety for the debt of his benefactor.
And God spake all
these words, saying, I [am] the LORD thy God [Ruler], which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt,
out of the house of bondage. Thou shalt have no other gods before me.
Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness [of
any thing] that [is] in heaven above, or that [is] in the earth
beneath, or that [is] in the water under the earth: Thou shalt not
bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God [Ruler] [am] a jealous God [Ruler], visiting the iniquity of
the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth [generation]
of them that hate me; And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that
love me, and keep my commandments. Thou shalt not take the name of
the LORD thy God [Ruler]
in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain. (Exodus
20:1, 7)
“Some scholars
regard the ancient confederation of Hebrew tribes that endured in
Palestine from the 15th century BC until a monarchy was established about 1020 BC as an embryonic republic. That would make the ancient Israelite
commonwealth the earliest republic in history and one of the oldest
democracies; except for slaves and women, all members of the
community had a voice in the selection of their administrators and
were eligible for political office.”
The Bible was not
establishing a religion but a Government. because “The law
given from Sinai was a civil and municipal as well as a moral and
religious code…”
“If
we will not be governed by God, then we will be ruled by tyrants.”
If the powers that
would be are to blame for our ascent into a subjective citizenship
then we would not be truly subject, for there would be no consent.
But the con-artist succeeds not because of his own larceny but
because of the larceny in the heart of those he has tempted and
deceived.
And many shall follow
their pernicious ways; by reason of whom the way of truth shall be
evil spoken of. And through covetousness shall they with feigned
words make merchandise of you: (II Peter 2,2-3)
“The
people never give up their liberties except under some dilution.”
According to their
uncleanness and according to their transgressions have I done unto
them, and hid my face from them. Therefore thus saith the Lord God;
Now will I bring again the captivity of Jacob, and have mercy upon
the whole house of Israel, and will be jealous for my name: (Ezekiel
39,24-25).
“All
who have ever written on government are unanimous, that among people
generally corrupt, liberty cannot long exist.” All the people who have beseeched government, voted for taxes
that enrich themselves personally and applied for those gifts,
gratuities and benefits offered so temptingly by government have by
those acts and deeds and words coveted their neighbors goods and made
them their own through the powers of their governing body.
“When statesmen forsake their consciences for what they
consider the public good, they lead the country down the short road
to chaos.”
“I believe there
are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by
gradual and silent encroachment of those powers than by violent and
sudden usurpations.”
Upon entering into a
democratic society individuals must give up a share of their liberty.
But isn’t a democracy good? It is the people choosing, not just
for themselves, but also their brother. All that the individual
person owns as citizen in The United States Federal Democracy has
been pooled into a common purse where the majority regularly
withdraws through their chosen leaders what ever they hope will
fulfill their needs, wants and desires.
Thou shalt not covet
thy neighbour’s house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s
wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his
ass, nor any thing that [is] thy neighbour’s. (Exodus 20:17)
If you want the
government to pay for something then you want your neighbor to pay
for that thing or provide that thing. The more you want your neighbor
to fulfill your desires the more it is that you covet your neighbors
goods and things. Coveting your neighbors goods is forbidden by God.
Some parents send their
children to a private school and pays school taxes anyway. People who
don’t want those neighbors to have a tax voucher to help with
their child’s tuition because their taxes might go up, they are
coveting their neighbors’ goods. If they want the government to
pay for their health care or old age pension or disability then they
want their neighbor to pay for it. The same goes for welfare, grants
and low interest loans etc. If they want their neighbor or their
neighbor’s son to go to Iraq and Kuwait to bring down or keep
down the price of oil so that they will have more money, then they
covet their neighbors’ goods and maybe even their life.
And the LORD said unto Cain, Where [is] Abel thy brother? And he said, I know not:
[Am] I my brother’s keeper? (Ge 4:9)
Entering into the
democracy is a free will choice. Look at the benefits and advantages.
But is it a good idea? Is it wise? Is it right? Are there
disadvantages?
“Reason
is the soul of the law, and
when the reason of any particular law ceases,
so does the law
itself.”
And he said, This will
be the manner of the king that shall reign over you: He will take
your sons, and appoint [them] for himself, for his chariots, and [to
be] his horsemen; and [some] shall run before his chariots. And he
will appoint him captains over thousands, and captains over fifties;
and [will set them] to ear his ground, and to reap his harvest, and
to make his instruments of war, and instruments of his chariots. And
he will take your daughters [to be] confectionaries, and [to be]
cooks, and [to be] bakers. And he will take your fields, and your
vineyards, and your oliveyards, [even] the best [of them], and give
[them] to his servants. And he will take the tenth of your seed, and
of your vineyards, and give to his officers, and to his servants. And
he will take your menservants, and your maidservants, and your
goodliest young men, and your asses, and put [them] to his work. He
will take the tenth of your sheep: and ye shall be his servants. And
ye shall cry out in that day because of your king which ye shall have
chosen you; and the LORD will not hear you in that day. Nevertheless the people refused to
obey the voice of Samuel; and they said, Nay; but we will have a king
over us; That we also may be like all the nations; and that our king
may judge us, and go out before us, and fight our battles. (1 Samuel
8:11, 20)
“He
has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of
Officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance…
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and
altering fundamentally, the Forms of our Governments:”
The Republic was a
place of individual responsibility. Each individual took on the
burden of protection from everything on an individual basis.
Education of our children, the care of the elderly and sick,
protection from poverty and the criminal elements of the world were
faced with individual courage and fortitude. Charity was handed out
by the hand of the donator to the receiver with a voluntary
commitment.
Bel boweth down, Nebo
stoopeth, their idols were upon the [community] beasts, and upon the [beast] cattle:
your carriages [were] heavy loaden; [they are] a burden to the weary.
They stoop, they bow down together; they could not [escape] deliver the burden, but themselves are gone into captivity. Hearken unto me, O house of Jacob, and all the remnant of the house
of Israel, which are borne [by me] from the belly, which are carried
from the womb: And [even] to [your] old age I [am] he; and [even] to
hoar hairs will I carry [you]: I have made, and I will bear; even I
will carry, and will deliver [you]. To whom will ye liken me, and
make [me] equal, and compare me, that we may be like? (Isaiah 46:1,
5)
The United States
Federal Government is a corporate entity or society which makes it a
person. A monarch is, “a single or sole ruler of a state…
a person or a thing that suppresses others of the same kind.” Can a democracy take the place of a king and who should be king?
“We
must realize that today’s Establishment is the new George III.
Whether it will continue to adhere to his tactics, we do not know. If
it does, the redress, honored in tradition, is also revolution…
the truth is that the vast bureaucracy now runs this country,
irrespective of what party is in power.”
Reform
of the Federal Judiciary in 1937 was an attempt to make democracy
king in America.
“Where, Say Some,
is the king of America? I’ll tell you, Friend, he reigns above,
and doth not make havoc of mankind like the royal brute of Great
Britain. Yet that we may not appear to be defective even in earthly
honours, let a day be solemnly set apart for proclaiming the charter;
let it be brought forth placed on divine law, the Word of God; let a
crown be placed thereon, by which the world may know, that so far as
we approve of monarchy, that in America the law is king. For as in
absolute governments the king is law, so in free countries the law
ought to be king; and there ought to be no other. But lest any ill
use should afterwards arise, let the crown at the conclusion of the
ceremony be demolished, and scattered among the People whose right it
is.”
The word federal comes
from the French word “federal” which comes from the Latin foedus, foederis a noun meaning, treaty, league; compact. To
give you an idea of the true meaning of foedus when it is used
as an adjective it means foul, hideous, revolting; vile, disgraceful.
Feudal also comes from the medieval Latin word foedum.
Feudalism was a system where a lord held title to the land and the
vassals and serfs lived on it. The vassal owed service and fealty to
his lord.
“As
long as we look to government to solve our problems we will always
suffer tyranny.”
Are there any problems
that society has not tried to place on the shoulders of government
and therefore upon their brother’s shoulders? Have we not, over
the years, magnified the place of government and the charisma of the
titular leaders of government in our lives.
“…a
dangerous ambition more often lurks behind the specious mask of zeal
for the rights of the people than under the forbidding appearance of
zeal for the firmness and efficiency of government. History will
teach us that the former has been found a much more certain road to
the introduction of despotism than the greatest number have begun
their career by paying an obsequious court to the people; commencing
demagogues, and ending tyrants.”
“Protection
draws to it subjection; subjection protection.”
Withhold thy foot from
being unshod, and thy throat from thirst: but thou saidst, There is
no hope: no; for I have loved strangers, and after them will I go. As
the thief is ashamed when he is found, so is the house of Israel
ashamed; they, their kings, their princes, and their priests, and
their prophets, Saying to a stock, Thou [art] my father; and to a
stone, Thou hast brought me forth: for they have turned [their] back
unto me, and not [their] face: but in the time of their trouble they
will say, Arise, and save us. But where [are] thy gods [rulers] that
thou hast made thee? let them arise, if they can save thee in the
time of thy trouble: for [according to] the number of thy cities are
thy gods [rulers], O Judah. Wherefore will ye plead with me? ye all
have transgressed against me, saith the LORD.
In vain have I smitten your children; they received no correction:
your own sword hath devoured your prophets, like a destroying lion. O
generation, see ye the word of the LORD.
Have I been a wilderness unto Israel? a land of darkness? wherefore
say my people, We are lords; we will come no more unto thee?
(Jer.2:25,31)
In a democracy the
people are collectively their own master, their own ruler. It does
not have to be so but it is the temptation of man’s vanity that
inclines him to disregard the will of his creator and become the
ruler of his brothers.
“His
vanity swelled him so vile and rank That he could hear no voices but
his own… Then and now Men must lie in their Master’s
Holy Hands, moved only as he wills: Our hearts most seek out that
will.”
“The
old king Bent close to the handle of the ancient relic, And saw
written there the story of ancient wars Between good and evil, the
opening of the waters, The Flood sweeping giants away, how they
suffered And died, that race who hated the Ruler Of us all and
received judgment from His hands,
Surging
waves that found them wherever They fled… A brood forever
opposing the Lord’s Will, and
again and again defeated.”
Suppose ye that I am
come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay but rather division.
(Luke 12:51)
“And
sometimes they sacrificed to the old stone gods, Made heathen vows,
hoping for Hell’s Support, the Devil’s guidance in
driving Their affliction off. That was their way, And the heathen’s
only hope, Hell Always in their hearts, knowing neither God Nor His
passing as He walks through our world, the Lord Of Heaven and earth;
their ears could not hear His praise nor know His glory. Let them
Beware, those who are thrust into danger, Clutched at by trouble yet
can carry no solace In their hearts, cannot hope to be better! Hail
To those who will rise to God, drop off Their dead bodies and seek
our Father’s peace!… Words and bright wit Won’t
help your soul; you’ll suffer hell’s fires, Unferth,
forever tormented… How often an entire country suffers On one
man’s account!”
Howbeit then, when ye
knew not God, ye did service unto them which by nature are no gods
[rulers]. But now, after that ye have known God [Ruler], or rather
are known of God, how turn ye again to the weak and beggarly
elements, whereunto ye desire again to be in bondage? (Ga 4:8,9)
In the Old Testament
the word ‘elohiym is the Hebrew word that is translated
into the English word God or gods. The word actually means ruler, judge. This meaning makes more sense when we remember there was no ruler
over the Israelites but God Himself until the people begged for a
king and Samuel anointed Saul.
And you, being dead in
your sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh, hath he quickened
together with him, having forgiven you all trespasses; Blotting out
the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary
to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross; [And]
having spoiled principalities and powers, he made a shew of them
openly, triumphing over them in it. (Col 2:13, 15)
Today
we will not even seek the wisdom of the profits. We, through our
handwritten decrees and constitutions, which created our democracies
and their authorities, shall choose our own rulers with the same
results history and the profits have foretold.
Absalom said moreover,
Oh that I were made judge in the land,… so Absalom stole the
hearts of the men of Israel. (2 Samuel 15:4,6)
Because men now follow
less in the ways of the Lord, being filled with vanities and pride,
they will follow a poorer choice than Absalom. And men will be bound
to their choice by words and deeds. Men and women may claim Christ as
their king and their lord but is it so?
But the chief priests
and elders persuaded the multitude that they should ask Barabbas, and
destroy Jesus. The governor answered and said unto them, Whether of
the twain will ye that I release unto you? They said, Barabbas.
Pilate saith unto them, What shall I do then with Jesus which is
called Christ? [They] all say unto him, Let him be crucified. And the governor said,
Why, what evil hath he done? But they cried out the more, saying, Let
him be crucified. When Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing, but
[that] rather a tumult was made, he took water, and washed [his]
hands before the multitude, saying, I am innocent of the blood of
this just person: see ye [to it]. Then answered all the people, and
said, His blood [be] on us, and on our children. (Mt. 27:20,25)
It was a vote of the
people, preferring the benefits, protection and vanities of Caesar,
that willfully chose to crucify the anointed King.
…, the devil
taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all
the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them; And saith unto
him, All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and
worship me. Then saith Jesus unto him, Get thee hence, Satan: for it
is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve. (Mt. 4:8, 10)
The adversary, the
devil, the powers that would be, had long since seduced the people
into handing their individual dominion over to that demonic and
central power.
And I heard another
voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not
partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.(Rev. 18:4)
God calls His people in
their hearts to separate from those false gods and rulers who have
unequally yoke their brothers under their Babylonian, patrimonial
power and authority.
Thou shalt not bow down
to their gods [rulers], nor serve them, nor do after their works: but
thou shalt utterly overthrow them, and quite break down their images.
(Ex 23:24)
This was the
call of the LORD from
Adam to Noah and Abraham to Samual.
With whom the LORD had made a covenant, and charged them, saying, Ye shall not fear
other gods, nor bow yourselves to them, nor serve them, nor sacrifice
to them: (2Ki 17:35)
It was with
the LORD we are to make
our covenants and perform our oaths.
Thou shalt not follow a
multitude to [do] evil; neither shalt thou speak in a cause to
decline after many to wrest [judgment]: (Exodus 23:2)
Is this where man sins?
He covets his brothers works. He joins together to obtain power over
those who fall prey to their defiance of their Father’s will.
“Democracies have
ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been
found incompatible with personal security, or the rights of property;
and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been
violent in their deaths.”
One of the most
memorable lines from the movie, “The Patriot” was spoken
by actor Mel Gibson, who asked, “Why should I trade one tyrant
3,000 miles away, for 3,000 tyrants one mile away?”
The book The Covenants of the gods is an
iconoclastic explication that shatters the delusions of a
deceived world. History, law and the Bible are melded together
in a unique eye opening exegesis that answers the burning
question that has haunted men since the beginning of
time.
"...Are men free souls under God?" Order this Book: Click Here
Media recordings: Click here
Here are descriptions of the contents of each chapters.
It is recommended that you study them in order.
- Holy Matrimony vs. Marriage discuses
the difference between Holy Matrimony, an Ecclesiastical
ceremony with no legal significance, and that legally binding
covenant with the state called Marriage that is in opposition
to the God given relationship of man and woman as Husband and
Wife.
- Law vs. Legal touches on some of the
fundamental opposing principles of these two different sources
of righteous authority, bondage and jurisdiction in past and
present established societies.
- Citizen vs. Citizen discusses at
least two distinct and different types of citizenship in America
today.
- Employ vs. Enslave explains the
fundamental differences between man's inalienable right to
the sweat of his brow granted him by his Creator and his legal
right to labor for another
master, ruler or god.
- God vs. Government speaks of the
principle conflict between God's way and man's foolishness.
- Heaven vs. Heaven discusses the nature
of God's Kingdom in Heaven and on Earth.
- Republic vs. Democracy talks of the
differences between these dissimilar and opposing forms of
government.
- Democracy vs. Demagogue touches on
the fallacies, foolishness and dangers of democracy.
- The System vs. The System references
the system established by man in opposition to the system
established by God the Father.
- Conversion vs. Reconversion discusses
the significance of equitable conversion, being born again, in
reference to land and labor and living in God's Kingdom.
- Money vs. Mammon references the
fallacies and foolishness and the fiat character of the present
money systems as well as its origins and nature and why it has
delivered you into destitution and bondage.
- Trust vs. Faith expresses the
importance of faith in The LORD God and the traps, seductions
and dangers of trusting in lesser gods.
- Deported vs. Departed references
excommunication from the world systems and why it has been
desired throughout history even unto this day.
- The Charagma vs. The Card touches
on the concepts of the beast and the image of the beast as well
as the so called mark of the beast as it was used then and now.
[What is the mark and why you have it].
- The Body of Christ Vs. The Body of the
State looks at the Church, the State established by Jesus
the Christ, manditorially exempt from the control of man's
government and churches established under the State with strict
operational restrictions.
- This information was condensed from the book Covenants of the gods.
Information about Setting a record that you are married at Holy Matrimony
Establishing a Church according to the ways of Christ
Establishing a Ministry
----   |
