|
The Covenants of the gods
The contractual nature of governments of the world
 EMPLOY
(the acceptable word)
Vs.
Enslave
(the unacceptable word)
Go to, let us go down,
and there confound their language, that they may not understand one
another’s speech. So the LORD scattered them abroad from thence
upon the face of all the earth: and they left off to build the city.
Therefore is the name of it called Babel; because the LORD did there
confound the language of all the earth: and from thence did the LORD
scatter them abroad upon the face of all the earth. (Genesis 11:7-9)
Babble is defined in
Webster’s as, “to say indistinctly or incoherently,”
or “to talk thoughtlessly.” While the word understand is
defined “to apprehend or comprehend; to know or grasp the
meaning, import, intention, or motive of; to perceive or discern the
meaning of; as, to understand a problem, an argument, an oracle, a
secret sign, indistinct speech, etc.” So, let us try to
apprehend the motive of words like employment in order to understand
the problem and maybe even the secret sign of what now may only be
thoughtless and indistinct speech.
We are ignorant
of many things which would not be hidden from us if the reading of
old authors was familiar to us.”
If we continue with
Webster’s we find employ to be defined, “1. to occupy the
time, attention, and labor of; to keep busy or at work; as, we employ
our hands in labor. 2. to use; to make use of;… 3. to provide
work and pay for; as, public works employ thousands of men. 4. to
engage in one’s service; to hire; as, the president employed an
envoy to negotiate a treaty… Syn.. -- use, hire, occupy,
devote, busy, engage, commission.”
The synonyms listed
here give a greater insight into the meaning of the word employ. The
first synonym we should note is the word use which as a verb is
defined, “To make use of, to convert to ones service, to avail
one’s self of, to employ.” To employ as a verb then denotes the idea of conversion. As a noun it
is defined as, “A confidence reposed in another… A use is further described as a “A right in a person, called
the cestui que use, to take the profits of land of which another has
legal title and possession, together with the duty of defending the
same and of making estates therefore according to the direction of
the cestui que use.” A use by nature is a trust. “Uses and trusts are not so much
different things as different aspects of the same subject.”
American
labor, which is the capital of our workingmen.”
Hire on the other hand
is, “A bailment in which compensation is to be given for the
use of a thing, or for labor and services about it. This contract
arises from the principles of natural law: it is voluntary, and
founded in consent: it involves mutual and reciprocal obligations;
and it is for mutual benefit …in hiring, the use of the thing
is the object.” The contract to hire arises from the natural law and by itself is not
a subject of equity. Hiring for an immediate and equal exchange
should be considered different than hiring for the purposes of profit
and gain at a future time for that would imply an interest or usury.
“All
government without the consent of the governed is the very definition
of slavery!”
“There is a clear
distinction between profit and wages or compensation for labour.” Compensation for labor is distinguished from profit. Wages are, “A
compensation given to a hired person for his or her services. As to
servants’ wages…” But at another time, “Compensation for labor can not be
regarded as profit within the meaning of the law. The word profit, as
ordinarily used, means the gain made upon any business or
investments. It is a different thing altogether from compensation for
labour.” Is the compensation for labor a business? “Labor, business, and
work are not synonyms. Labor may be business but it is not
necessarily so; and business is not always labor. Labor implies toil;
exertion producing weariness; manual exertion of a toilsome nature.” Labor is the expenditure of ourselves when it is not a matter of
business. “The early Christian writer looked upon business as a
peril to the soul.” Business today is synonymized with the words, “occupation,
employment, employ.” “Employment is a business relation, if not itself a business.” “It is easy to escape business, if you will only despise the
rewards of business.” When does the compensation for labor become a business and therefore
a profit or gain? And does the word business need to be defined or
redefined in our own minds?
the
modern philosophy of law is that a man may sell his services but not
himself, as was pointed out in Kadis v. Britt, 224, NC 154, 29 SE2d
543…”
To employ is also
defined as, “to give occupation to: n. occupation. Syn. EMPLOY,
use. We ‘employ’ whatever we take into our service, or
make subservient to our convenience for a time; we ‘use’
whatever we entirely devote to our purpose.” The synonym occupy should include occupation. Occupy comes from the
Latin occupare meaning, “to take possession of, to
possess, to employ.” While, OCCUPATION means, “Possession;
control; tenure; use… The word ‘occupation’ must
be held to have reference to the vocation, profession, trade or
calling which the assured is engaged in for hire or for profit.” The word ‘profession’ comes from the Latin word
professio, meaning a “declaration; public register;
profession,” which is defined as “the declaring …the
avowal of belief in …the body of persons in a particular
calling or occupation.” A professional is “a person
belonging to one of the professions” or “a person who
makes some activity not usually followed for gain… the source
of his livelihood.” Such as a doctor who cares for the sick for
money rather than as an act of mercy or a lawyer who fights not for
justice but as a mercenary for hire. And an occupation of course is a
“use” which is a trust (a confidence reposed in another)
where the beneficial interest (rights to the profits or gain) is
regarded. While, an assured is, “A person who has been insured
by some insurance company, or underwriter, against losses or perils
mentioned in the policy of insurance.”
Protection
draws to it subjection; subjection protection”
The term employ can be
defined “to equitably convert.” The employer occupies and
possesses the use of the employee. But who is the employer and master
of your labor?
EMPLOYEES
See Master and Servant (this index)”
If Edward Everyman is
hired by the Willard Widgetmaker, we call Ed an employee and Willard
an employer. Ed has earlier gone down to his local social security
Administration office and obtained an “employee identification
number.” Ed is employed. Is Ed’s employer Willard or someone else? Is
Willard acting as an agent or taskmaster for a third entity? Willard
has an “employee identification number,” and he also has
an additional number known as an “employer identification
number.” Ed stands ready to serve his new master but Ed and
Willard have undergone conversions. If Willard mistreats Ed who does
he answer too? Isn’t it Willard who is vested with the
responsibility to collect and deliver a portion of Ed’s labor
in the form of tax to Willard’s and Ed’s true master? If
Ed gives notice to Willard and quits his job is he unemployed or
non-employed? If Willard is only an agent or an employed taskmaster
himself then is Ed simply applying for a different taskmaster while
he is unused and unemployed but still converted and subject? Can Ed
undergo reconversion back to his original free status?
The
people never give up their liberties except under some dilution.
Some have believed that
the income tax on labor of individuals is a direct tax due to the
Sixteenth Amendment and then they claim that particular amendment was
never legally ratified. Even though that may be true it has nothing
to do with individual income tax.
“By the previous
ruling [Brushaber Case] it was settled that the Sixteenth Amendment
conferred no new power of taxation but simply prohibited the previous
complete and plenary power of income taxation possessed by Congress
from the beginning from being taken out of the category of indirect
taxation to which it inherently belonged....”
“In the matter of
taxation, the Constitution recognizes the two great classes of direct
and indirect taxes, and lays down two rules by which their imposition
must be governed, namely: The rule of apportionment as to direct
taxes, and the rule of uniformity as to duties, imposts and excises.” Chief Justice Fuller in Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & T. Co. 157 U. S. supra, at page 557
Is the graduated
income tax a direct tax or and indirect tax? “The contention
that the Amendment treats a tax on income as a direct tax … is
… wholly without foundation.” An indirect tax can be, “A tax laid upon the happening of an
event, as distinguished from its tangible fruits, is an indirect
tax.”
Therefore they did set
over them taskmasters to afflict them with their burdens. And they
built for Pharaoh treasure cities, Pithom and Raamses. (Ex 1:11)
The word Income can
mean, “the return in money from one’s business, labor, or
capital invested. Income is the gain which proceeds from labor …its
usual synonyms being ‘gain,’ ‘profit,’
‘revenue.’ …Income is the gain derived from
capital, from labor, or both combined…“The general term income is not defined in the Internal Revenue
Code.” Their “description of income” originally was the, “Total
amount derived from salaries, wages, or compensation for personal
service of whatever kind and in whatever form paid,” and, “income derived from a source is taxable without
apportionment.”
“Income”
now is described as the total, “Wages, salaries, tips, etc… Yet we find elsewhere that, “Wages, salaries and first time
commissions are not ‘income’ (profit or gain)… but
an even exchange of labor for money. Such money is a ‘source,’
not ‘income,’ and not taxable.”
“The
conclusion reached in the Pollock Case did not in any degree involve
holding that income taxes generically and necessarily came within the
class of direct taxes on property, but on the contrary recognized the
fact that taxation on income was in its nature an excise entitled to
be enforced as such.”
All
men are freemen or slaves.
If wages were the source from which income could have been derived and now wages
are the income itself then something has changed or been converted.
If labor is the source from which wages are derived then it must be
the nature of the individual who labors which has undergone a
conversion.
To be employed is to
convert the use of one’s labor and service to the use or
service of another in the hope of some future benefit and assurance.
It is the conversion of a natural right by an act of mutual consent.
It involves a relationship of trust and an investment of substance
(sweat, effort and time) in the form of managed service in order to
be enriched. It is the subjection of oneself to another in hope of
gain and benefit. If liberty is the, “State or fact of being a
free person; exemption from subjection to the will of another
claiming ownership of the person or services; freedom;” then a portion of our liberty and freedom is sacrificed or at least
offered up at the moment of our legal employment.
Every man also to whom
God hath given riches and wealth, and hath given him power to eat
thereof, and to take his portion, and to rejoice in his labour; this
[is] the gift of God. ( Ec 5:19)
It should be clear that
a man’s labor is a gift from God as life itself is also His
gift to us. In other words our labor is a privilege granted by our
God and therefore taxable by him from the moment of our birth if not
our conception. God’s endowment of privilege, being the creator
of mankind, is the definition of unalienable rights and “to
secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving
their just powers from the consent of the governed.” Please note, “Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude …
shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to its
jurisdiction.”
“Then
people have to obey other people’s orders, equality is out of
the question.”
Once upon a time, a
young boy asked his father, an attorney, “Who do you work for?”
The Lawyer, being
accustomed to speaking distinctly and accurately, comprehending
points of law and being in a fifty percent income tax bracket,
answered, “Well, until July 1st, I work for the government.
After that, I work for myself.”
Whatever
day makes man a slave, takes half his worth away.
Income tax is, “a
tax on the yearly profits arising from property, professions, trades
and offices. An income tax is not levied upon property, funds, or
profits, but upon the right of an individual or corporation to
receive income or profits. Under various constitutional and statutory
provisions, a tax on income is said to be an excise tax and not a tax
on property, nor on business, but a tax on the proceeds arising
therefrom. But in other cases an income tax is said to be a property
and not a personal or excise tax.” Income tax is said to be an excise tax but in other cases it is said
not to be an excise tax. Under one condition it is not a property but
in another condition it may have been converted to a property. Wages
are said not to be income but are listed as income in other places.
Confusion would seem to be justified. There must be a point in time
when a significant change or conversion takes place. So, what are we
missing? One thing to note in the search for truth is when these
different statements are made.
“One
could look into a caldron in which the Government and the people of
the United States were moving around in response to a new idea,…”
Maybe there is a clue
in the fact that, “An ‘excise tax’ is an indirect
charge for the privilege of following an occupation or trade, or
carrying on a business; while an ‘income tax’ is a direct
tax imposed upon income, and is as directly imposed as is a tax on
land.” In other words income taxes paid by corporations that have no
inalienable rights could be an excise tax. But a laborer paid by the
day with no other interest would simply exchange one dollar labor for
one dollar pay unless he converted his inalienable right to his God
given labor into the property of another in hope of a benefit.
“Labour
was the first price, the original purchase-money that was paid for
all things. It was not by gold or by silver, but by labour, that all
wealth of the world was originally purchased.”
“First: The tax
which is described in statute as an excise, is laid with uniformity
throughout the United States as a duty an impost or an excise upon
the relation of employment” Is the act of employment the act of selling oneself into servitude
for the hope of security in society?
“This
was a new type of legislation--- nothing of the sort had ever come
before the congress of the United States before, it took much
explaining and much patience.”
Let us digress one more
time in order to bring these thoughts together. In colonial America,
“The ordinary citizen, living on his farm, owned in fee simple,
untroubled by any relics of Feudalism, untaxed save by himself,
saying his say to all the world in townmeetings, had gained a new
self-reliance. Wrestling with his soul and plow on week days, and the
innumerable points of the minister’s sermon on Sundays and
meeting days, he was becoming a tough nut for any imperial system to
crack.” On the other hand citizens of the United States do not own their own
land today. They have at best only a legal title which does not
include “ownership of an estate” since it carries “no
beneficial interest.”
In the original
American Republics, citizenship of the individual freeman depended
upon his ownership of land in fee-simple as an estate, but “in
the United States ‘it is a political obligation’
depending not on ownership of land, but on the enjoyment of the
protection of government; and it ‘binds the citizen to the
observance of all laws’ of his sovereign.”
“For as labor
cannot produce without the use of land, the denial of the equal right
to the use of land is necessarily the denial of the right of labor to
its own produce.”
“An absolute or
fee-simple estate is one in which the owner is entitled to the entire
property, with unconditional power of disposition during his life,
and descending to his heirs and legal representatives upon his death
intestate.” In contrast a legal title is “the apparent right of ownership
and possession, but which carries no beneficial interest in the
property, another person being equitably entitled thereto; in either
case, the antithesis of ‘equitable title.’
If a legal title does
not include a right to the beneficial interest then a legal right to
work as an employee does not include a right to the “profit,
benefit, or advantage resulting from a contract,” nor does it
include “the ownership of an estate.” After all, a
beneficial interest is “distinct from the legal ownership.”
By definition, a legal
title is the opposite or at least the antithesis of an “equitable
title.” An equitable title as opposed to a legal title “is
a right in the party” rather than only appearing to be a right.
More important it is “the beneficial interest of one person
whom equity regards as the real owner, although the legal title is
vested in another.”
This dividing of true
title into a legal title on one hand verses an equitable title on the
other is called equitable conversion. Equitable conversion is a
“Conversion” or a “Constructive conversion.”
It may be, “An implied or virtual conversion, which takes place
where a person does such acts in reference to the goods of another as
amount in law to the appropriation of the property to himself.”
CONVERSION is an,
“alteration, interchange, metamorphosis, passage,
reconstruction....” While, RECONVERSION as a noun is a “change,
change over, … rebirth…
Jesus answered and said
unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born
again, he cannot see the kingdom of God. (John 3:3)
The word legal
originates in the idea of being connected to a legal system by
contract. The connection is created by consent. What is to be legal
becomes law by that consent and one of the essential ingredients of
that consent is mutual consideration whether by application or
indulgence. A person may waive certain rights naturally inherent in
an individual and become obligated to abide by the administration of
another authority. Covenants, contracts, compacts are of the same
order.
Take heed to thyself,
lest thou make a covenant with the inhabitants of the land whither
thou goest, lest it be for a snare in the midst of thee: (Exodus 34,
12.)
“Quasi contracts
are lawful and purely voluntary acts of a man, from which there
results any obligation whatever to a third person, and sometimes a
reciprocal obligation between the parties. Persons who have not
contracted with each other are often regarded by Roman law, under a
certain state of facts, as if they had actually concluded a
convention between themselves. The legal relation which then takes
place between these persons, which has always a similarity to a
contract obligation, is therefore termed ‘obligatio quasi ex
contractu.’ Such a relation arises from the conducting of
affairs without authority, (negotorium,) from the payment of what was
not due, (solutio indebiti,) from tutorship and curatorship, and from
taking possession of an inheritance. A ‘quasi contract’
is what was formerly known as the contract implied in law; it has no
reference to the intentions or expressions of the parties. The
obligation is imposed despite, and frequently in frustration of their
intention. A ‘quasi or constructive contract’ rests upon
the equitable principle that a person shall not be allowed to enrich
himself unjustly at the expense of another, and is not in fact a
contract, but an obligation, which the law creates in the absence of
any agreement, when and because the acts of the parties or others
have placed in the possession of one person money, or its equivalent,
under such circumstance that in equity and good conscience he ought
not to retain it. A ‘quasi’ or constructive contract is
an application of law. An ‘implied’ contract is an
implication of fact. In the former the contract is mere fiction,
imposed in order to adapt the case to a given remedy. In the latter,
the contract is a fact legitimately inferred. In one, the duty
defines the contract; in the other, the contract defines the duty.”
If you take what is not
yours you have a constructive contract to repay or you are a thief.
If you take something from someone that owes you nothing then you are
creating an obligation to pay back. If you apply for benefits you
bind yourself to reciprocating obligations. There is little, if
anything, government gives without strings attached. These strings
bind you on earth and in God’s eyes as well.
And it was told the
king of Egypt that the people fled: and the heart of Pharaoh and of
his servants was turned against the people, and they said, Why have
we done this, that we have let Israel go from serving us? (Ex 14:5)
Were the Israelites
slaves or servants? One subscribed to difference is that slavery is
by compulsion and servitude is by agreement. In fact and law,
servitude by consent is often the more binding.
Those
captured by pirates and robbers remain free.
The same could be said
for land or any other property. If something is stolen has the
ownership changed. But if something is sold, given away or abandoned
the ownership is considered to have been transferred.
Things
captured by pirates and robbers do not change ownership.
There may be other
distinction between a slave and a servant but the distinction is less
important to the subject than the Master. The fact is the Israelites
were not slaves in Egypt in the strictest sense of the word. Yet,
their burden was just as if not more disagreeable and their chains
were just as real.
“Slaves never
became an important ingredient of Egyptian civilization. The large
subject population and enforceable corvee’ system - by which
serfs had to work temporarily as slaves - made a permanent force of
slaves unnecessary.”
The
man who gives me employment, which I must have or suffer, that man is
my master, let me call him what I will.
Slavery in Rome,
although accomplished often by conquest, was much like that system
used in Egypt at the time of Moses. “The state of the slave
varied. Some were impressed into gangs that worked the fields and
mines. Others were highly skilled workers and trusted administrators.
Frequently slaves were far better off than free laborers. Roman laws
were passed to protect slaves and to allow rights, even of private
possessions, which were sometimes used to ransom the slave and his
family (Acts 22:27-28).” “Other forms of servitude related to slavery, and sometimes
indistinguishable from it, are serfdom, debt bondage, indentured
service, peonage, and corvée (also called statute labor).”
“Are
men the property of the state? Or are they free souls under God? This
same battle continues throughout the world.”
“The corvée was different from other forced labor arrangements because it was
labor performed for the government, involuntarily, on large public
works projects. (The word corvée meant ‘contribution,’
signifying one’s obligation to the state.) In some cases the
corvée meant a specified amount of time given to the state
every year, as prescribed by law. Another name for it was, therefore,
statute labor. It was used by the Romans for the upkeep of roads,
bridges, and dikes but got its name in France early in the 18th
century.”
Servitude.
A term which indicates the subjection of one person to another
person, or of a person to a thing, or of a thing to a person, or of a
thing to a thing. Bouvier’s
8th 1859
We often hear an income
tax obligation called a contribution. In Pharaoh’s Egypt
in the days of their captivity the tribute tax paid by his subjects
was equivalent to two and a half months, all the gold and silver was
in the government treasury instead of the hands of the people and
everyone only had a legal title to their land, their stock and their
lives. To pay off the average corvée tax liability in 1995 for
employees in the United States required four months and five days. A
citizen of the United States Government who has legal title to what
appears to be his property (land, vehicles, labor etc.) has no right
to its beneficial interest or use and therefore no right to the
profits they produce.
...and ye shall be
plucked from off the land whither thou goest to possess it... and
there thou shalt serve other gods,.. shalt thou find no ease…shalt
have none assurance of thy life: (Deuteronomy 28:63, 66) How doth the
city sit solitary, [that was] full of people! [how] is she become as
a widow! she [that was] great among the nations, [and] princess among
the provinces, [how] is she become tributary ! (La 1:1)
Here tributary
was translated from the Hebrew word “mac” (mas) meaning
“gang/body of forced labourers, task-workers, labour band/gang,
forced service, task-work, serfdom, tributary, tribute, levy,
taskmasters, discomfited … forced service, serfdom, tribute,
enforced payment.” “Of the twenty-three uses of this term, all but three (Isa
31:8; Lam1:1; Est 10:1) occur early in the literature. The
institution of tribute or corvee involves involuntary, unpaid labour or other service for superior
power-a feudal lord, a king, or a foreign ruler (Ex 1:11; Est 10:1;
Lam 1:1). in Gen. 49:15, Jacob’s blessing on Issachar
identifies him as bowing to ‘tribute.’ In Egypt, the
Israelites find themselves in that position (Ex 1:11). This unpopular
measure, and Rehoboam’s refusal to moderate it, was the
immediate cause of the secession of the ten tribes and the
establishment of the northern kingdom.”
The same dealt
subtilly with our kindred, and evil entreated our fathers, so that
they cast out their young children, to the end they might not live.
(Acts 7: 19)
Have the American
people been dealt with subtly? Does subtly mean fraud or does it
mean, as it does with Arab camel dealers or western horse traders. Is
the rule of thumb caveat emptor, let the buyer beware? The tax
liability in the United States exceeds six months of labor yet many
call it freedom.
“Many
a man thinks he is buying pleasure,
when
he is really selling himself a slave to it.” Ben Franklin.
Has our
deception been the result of their lies or our apathetic ignorance
and/or our covetous appetite for the benefits, gratuities and grants?
“If men, through
fear, fraud, or mistake, should in terms renounce or give up any
natural right, the eternal law of reason and the grand end of society
would absolutely vacate such renunciation. The right to freedom being
a gift of ALMIGHTY GOD,
it is not in the power of man to alienate this gift and voluntarily
become a slave.” But a recompense may need to be paid and equity satisfied.
Was the fear created by
your own cowardliness, avarice or lack of faith? Was their fraud do
to lies or were you to ignorant, incompetent or lazy to find out what
kind of a deal you were making? Now mistake is the most reasonable
assumption. Yet, once the mistake is discovered it should be acted
upon, otherwise, by your lack of renunciation consent is considered
given.
For
when they speak great swelling words of vanity, they allure through
the lusts of the flesh, through much wantonness, those that were
clean escaped from them who live in error. While they promise them
liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption: for of whom
a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in bondage.
For having overcome the
pollutions of the world through the knowledge of the Lord and Saviour
Jesus Christ, they are again entangled therein, and overcome, the
latter end is worse with them than beginning. For it had been better
for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than, after they
have known it, to turn from the holy commandment delivered unto them.
But it is happened unto them according to the true proverb, ‘The
dog is turned to his own vomit again; and the sow that was washed to
her wallowing in the mire.’ (II Peter 2, 18-22).
SOCIAL
SECURITY ACT, August 14,1935, TITLE VIII---TAXES WITH
RESPECT TO EMPLOYMENT, INCOME TAX ON EMPLOYEES, SEC. 801. In addition
to other taxes, there shall be levied, collected, and paid upon the
income of every individual a tax equal to the following percentages
of wages (as defined in section 811)
Sec.
811. When used in this title... (b) The Term “employment”
means any service, of whatever nature, performed within the United
States by an employee for his employer except---
he
real destroyers of the liberties of the people is he who spreads
among them bounties, donations and benefits.”
A man void of
understanding striketh hands, [and] becometh surety .... Pr
17:18
Did or does congress
have the authority or power to establish a retirement scheme? Even
with its formidable power to control interstate commerce the congress
was never given the duty to become an insurance company for every ill
that might fall the inhabitants of this land.
“The
catalogue of means and actions which might be imposed upon an
employer in any business, tending to the satisfaction and comfort of
his employees, seems endless. Provision for free medical attendance
and nursing, for clothing, for food, for housing, for the education
of children, and a hundred other matters might with equal propriety
be proposed as tending to relieve the employee of mental strain and
worry. Can it fairly be said that the power of Congress to regulate
interstate commerce extends to the prescription of any or all of
these things? Is it not apparent that they are really and essentially
related solely to the social welfare of the worker, and therefore
remote from any regulation of commerce as such? We think the answer
is plain. These matters obviously lie outside the orbit of
congressional power.”
If Congress did not
have the power to establish an insurance system who wanted it?
“The President
wanted everybody covered for every contingency in life---’cradle
to the grave,’ he called it---under the social insurance system… But the Government of the United States is not an
insurance company and so it could be done.”
Neither the President
nor the congress had the power to compel the free people of America
to begin to labor without pay. They could not force the entire
population into becoming tax collectors and surfs, taskmasters and
statute laborers.
How could an entire
nation be bound into slavery?
20
C.F.R. § 422.1(ii) Any person who wishes to file an application
for an account number may do so by filing Form SS-5.
Not so: go now ye [that
are] men, and serve the LORD;
for that ye did desire. And they were driven out from Pharaoh’s
presence. (Ex 10:11)
20
C.F.R. § 422.103 (b) Applying for a number - (1) Form SS-5.
An individual needing a social security number may apply for one by
filing a signed form SS-5,
“Application for A Social Security Number Card,” at any
social security office and submitting the required evidence.
For thou, Lord, [art]
good, and ready to forgive; and plenteous in mercy unto all them that
call upon thee. Give ear, O LORD,
unto my prayer; and attend to the voice of my supplications. In the
day of my trouble I will call upon thee: for thou wilt answer me.
(Psalms 86:5,7)
Is it not the “Social
Security Number” or “Employee Identification Number”
or “Tax Identification Number,” being all one in the
same, that is given as the sign of your eligibility for the benefit
of legal employment, legal conversion? Whether you hand your card to
your prospective licensed employer/taskmaster or simply give him your
diligently memorized numerical identifier it is still that number
that marks you for service. Your enforced payment or contribution
will be collected before you even see it and you will toil without
pay.
Art
thou less a slave because thy master loves and caresses thee?”
Pascal.
There are many benefits
you shall receive besides your wages. Banks shall welcome you,
schools, public assistance, unemployment, workmen’s
compensation, credit cards, of course social security, medical aid,
government assistance, loans and grants and finally the deductibility
of the children entrusted to you. The list goes on under these new
covenants and contracts offered the American people and the world.
Who will repent and turn away from benefits and privileges, even
though in fact he burdens his neighbor and creates an obligation by
choosing to “enrich himself unjustly at the expense of
another”?
My son, if thou be
surety for thy friend, [if] thou hast stricken thy hand with a
stranger, with the words of thy mouth… How long wilt thou
sleep, O sluggard? when wilt thou arise out of thy sleep? [Yet] a
little sleep, a little slumber, a little folding of the hands to
sleep: So shall thy poverty come as one that travelleth, and thy want
as an armed man. (Proverbs 6:1,11)
"In
Flemming v. Nestor, decided in 1960, the Supreme Court ruled that
Social Security is an umbrella term for two schemes that are legally
unrelated. One is a taxation scheme, the other a welfare scheme.
Workers and their families have no legal claim on the tax payments
that they make into the U.S. Treasury or that are made on their
behalf. Those funds are gone, commingled with the general assets of
the U.S. government. This decision rested on a previous case,
Helvering v. Davis, in which the Court ruled that Social Security was
not an insurance program."
The Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, a.k.a. Public Law 104-191
- 104th Congress, An Act, begins, “To amend the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 to improve portability and continuity of health
insurance coverage in the group and individual markets, to combat
waste, fraud, and abuse in health insurance and health care delivery,
to promote the use of medical savings accounts, to improve access to
long-term care services and coverage, to simplify the administration
of health insurance, and for other purposes. (NOTE: Aug. 21, 1996 -
(H.R. 3103))” So, what do they mean other purposes?
Way down at the bottom
of this book size bill we find section 511 through 513 which provides
for the forfeiture of property of anyone who losses his/her United
States Citizenship (within the meaning of section 877 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986). “nonresident aliens individuals.”
Also,
section 403 of H.R. 3103 will amend Title 42 US.
Code section 405c(2)c(i) by changing the word “MAY”
to the word “SHALL”
which will require a SSN on all state or county (a political subdivision) documents.
This will in affect nullify the Privacy Act as the local governments
bow down to federal funding. H.R. 3130 also establishes a national
“instant check” employee/employer database system.
Employment is a privilege/benefit. No number, no work. Also county
deeds, courts agencies as well as state licenses, permits and
documents will no longer be available without the card in your hand
or the number in your head for computer verification.
The
list goes on and on, The Welfare Reform Act of 1996, The Balanced
Budget Act of 1997, and Public Law 104-193, additionally, a sister
law, Public Law 104-208, and Public Law: 105-33 all contain
information for associating the Social Security Number with a
National ID card.
“Title 42
U.S.C. § 666(a) In order to satisfy section 654(20)(A) of
this title, each State must have in effect laws requiring the use of
the following… “(13) Procedures requiring that the
social security number of - “(A) any applicant for a
professional license, driver’s license, occupational license,
or marriage license be recorded on the application…”
etc., etc., etc…
You have a legal
entitlement to work and the equitable title or true or lawful owner
of your labor is another. You are given into a trust, the unrighteous
mammon, at the moment of your conversion. The trust in turn holds
that ownership of your labor as a surety for the debts of the trust.
Your sweat, labor and blood is incorporated into a system of mutual
entitlements with authoritarian benefactors.
Disguise
thyself as thou wilt, still, Slavery! said I, still thou art a bitter
draught
Why are forfeiture
laws for a citizenship change found buried in an act about insurance?
How have we been so
deceived to believe slavery is freedom and bondage is security?
“For
140 years this nation has tried to impose objectives downward from a
lofty command center made up of ‘experts,’ a central
elite of social engineers,… It hasn’t worked. It won’t
work.... It doesn’t work because its fundamental premises are
mechanical, anti-human, and hostile to family life. Lives can be
controlled by machine education but they will always fight back with
weapons of social pathology: drugs, violence, self-destruction,
indifference, and the symptoms I see in the children I teach.”
“It
destroys communities by relegating the training of children to the
hands of certified experts - and by doing so it ensures our children
cannot grow up fully human …- becoming instead mindless
automatons programmed by the state’s change agents. Rather than
instilling in youngsters an appreciation for individual liberty, the
system has brought to life the ancient pharaonic dream of Egypt:
compulsory subordination for all.... Schools teach exactly what they
are intended to teach and they do it well: how to be a good Egyptian
and remain in your place in the pyramid.”
If a ruler hearken to
lies, all his servants [are] wicked. (Pr 29:12)
“The
future of education, and of America as a free society, depends on the
liberation of the American family from the grip of the public school…
Regardless of motives, the people who foisted state education on us
have committed a grave offense.... Using a variety of strategies, we
must reclaim the right to raise our children and to help them educate
themselves. In a fundamental sense, that is the American way.”
Therefore thus saith the
Lord GOD; Now will I
bring again the captivity of Jacob, (Ezekiel 39:25 )
When the 1787
Constitution was ready to be submitted to the Governors of the states
for ratification, Patrick Henry, the immortal voice for Liberty,
lectured against it in the Virginia State House for three weeks,
criticizing the Constitution, warning that it had been written “as
if good men will take office!” He asked “what they would
do when evil men took office!” “When evil men take
office, the whole gang will be in collusion,” he declared, “and
they will keep the people in utter ignorance and steal their liberty
by ambuscade!” He further warned that the new federal
government had too much money and too much power and it would
consolidate power unto itself, converting us “into one solid
empire.” And the President with the treaty power would “lead
in the treason.”
We like to believe that
we live in a free country, not like the poor unfortunate citizens of
the former Union of the Soviet Socialist Republic, a communist
government within a republic. What is the key difference between the
United States and mother Russia?
A
SUMMARY OF THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO
1.
Abolition of private property. [Legal title does not include the
beneficial use of the property.]
2.
Heavy progressive income tax. [An employee has only a legal title to
his labor.]
3.
Abolition to all rights of inheritance. [Inheritance tax on property
with a legal title.]
4.
Confiscation of property of all emigrants and rebels. [Forfeiture
laws.]
5.
A Central bank [Federal Reserve. The Bankers Bank.]
6.
Government control of Communications and Transportation. [F.C.C.,
F.A.A. etc..]
7.
Government ownership of factories and agriculture. [Corporations are
entities of the State, forfeiture laws, executive orders and mere
legal title.]
8.
Government control of labor. [Social Security, income tax and
incorporation.]
9.
Corporate farms, regional planning. [Land planning, biospheres,
endangered species, etc..]
10.
Free education for all children in government controlled schools.
[Public schools, 501c3 corporate private schools, controlled by
federal regulations.]
“Maybe
we ought to see that every person who gets a tax return receives a
copy of the Communist Manifesto with it so he can see what’s
happening to him”
Has the ‘use’
of your labor been bought and sold like flesh on the slaver’s
block? Have you become a surety to pay a debt? Have you returned to
Egypt entered the Roman Empire, born again in the hearts of men,
devoid of the wisdom of God? Is there more than one way that has
brought you to the loss of the ‘use’ of your labor, your
land and your loved ones?
The
essence of all slavery consists in taking the produce of another’s
labor by force. It is immaterial whether this force be founded upon
ownership of the slave or ownership of the money that he must get to
live.”
USE n. 11. Law. That enjoyment of property that consists in its
employment, occupation, exercise, or practice; specif., Roman and
Civil Law, a personal servitude consisting in a jus intendi, or right
to make use of a thing, as distinguished from the usufruct. The
usuary had only a personal right that was limited by his own
necessities or those of his family. He was not entitled to the use
and profits of the subject of the use. … advantage; benefit;
profit; specif., the benefit or profit of lands and tenements the
legal title to which is given to a person other than the one entitled
to the occupation or use( (in sense 11); a trust of real estate.
Deeds of land made to one person to, or for, the use of another.”
[see doctrine of the law of uses, Statute of Mortmain]
Also, the traveling merchants of the earth…, full stock of gold and silver and precious stones, and of pearls, and fine linen,… and all manner vessels… and iron, and marble, And cinnamon, …and wine, and oil, and fine flour, and wheat, and beasts, and sheep, resource? And if you are in the service of another, then who is that mysterious master of this legal tower of babble? What doctrines and ordinances does he propagate?
mystery
… 677. USE 1. n. use,
employment, employ; exercise, ... application… administration
service… usufruct, enjoyment of property, right of using, user
[all Law]; consumption … usefulness, benefit etc. 644. 3. n.
utilization, conversion to use, employment, employing etc. v. 4. n.
user, employer… profit by, exploit, turn to account, convert
to one’s service, convert or turn to use... press or enlist
into service... call or draw forth. dispose of, assign to a use,
dedicate, devote, consecrate; task, tax, put to task;… reap
the benefits of. 6. v. use up, devour, swallow up... drain of
resources.
Just
to get the benefit of a passport allegiance now required and
presumed.
“No passport shall
be granted or issued to or and horses, and chariots and slaves and
human souls. (Rev.18:11,13.)
Have you been
manipulated into applying into servitude, to a mystery government of
control, because of the lack of knowledge concerning words like use,
employ and occupy? Have you been utilized, exploited, consecrated to
a task? Have you been devoured, swallowed up, drained into a common
vat of labor. Are you a human verified for any other persons than
those owing allegiance, whether citizens or not, to the United
States.” 22 U.S.C., Section 212. Persons entitled to passport
Title
8, CFR PART 337 establishes what the Allegiance to the United States
is. You are bound under the agreement that states under oath,
affirmation or by application and deed that, "I absolutely and
entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any
foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, of whom or which I
have heretofore been a subject or citizen".
Jesus Christ preached a
kingdom, was called a Savior or Soter in the Greek which means ruler.
Even Christ means anointed, as in anointed King like David. He was
the “highest Son of David. Are you denouncing Christ by such
allegiance. Early Christians thought so and died for their refusal.
This allegiance goes on
to say "that I will perform work of national importance under
civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this
obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of
evasion; so help me God." This allegiance requires that you must
submit to laboring for the government under the direction of civilian
taskmasters. Have we agreed to bow down and serve these other
masters?
Is there another way to
do things?
What is the song of
Moses? What is the song of the Lamb? Is our sin the fact that we
serve another god other than the God, our Father, who created us? Is
our sin the sin of Cain, Nimrod and Core? Or is our error merely a
lack of knowledge? Is not all sin a lack of the knowledge of God? To
know God is to have a relationship with God. Are those who say they
believe in God, trust in God, pray and serve God alone really just
taking His name in vain while their true faith is in the governments
they create with their own hands? Are we covenanting, contracting and
binding ourselves to strangers?
And I saw... them that
had gotten the victory over the beast, and over his image, and over
his mark, [and] over the number of his name.... And they sing the
song of Moses the servant of God, and the song of the Lamb...
(Rev.15:2,3)
Do you know
the song of Moses and the Song of the Lamb? Have you taught it to
your children? Do you sing it in your Churches and in your lives?
The book The Covenants of the gods is an
iconoclastic explication that shatters the delusions of a
deceived world. History, law and the Bible are melded together
in a unique eye opening exegesis that answers the burning
question that has haunted men since the beginning of
time.
"...Are men free souls under God?" Order this Book: Click Here
Media recordings: Click here
Here are descriptions of the contents of each chapters.
It is recommended that you study them in order.
- Holy Matrimony vs. Marriage discuses
the difference between Holy Matrimony, an Ecclesiastical
ceremony with no legal significance, and that legally binding
covenant with the state called Marriage that is in opposition
to the God given relationship of man and woman as Husband and
Wife.
- Law vs. Legal touches on some of the
fundamental opposing principles of these two different sources
of righteous authority, bondage and jurisdiction in past and
present established societies.
- Citizen vs. Citizen discusses at
least two distinct and different types of citizenship in America
today.
- Employ vs. Enslave explains the
fundamental differences between man's inalienable right to
the sweat of his brow granted him by his Creator and his legal
right to labor for another
master, ruler or god.
- God vs. Government speaks of the
principle conflict between God's way and man's foolishness.
- Heaven vs. Heaven discusses the nature
of God's Kingdom in Heaven and on Earth.
- Republic vs. Democracy talks of the
differences between these dissimilar and opposing forms of
government.
- Democracy vs. Demagogue touches on
the fallacies, foolishness and dangers of democracy.
- The System vs. The System references
the system established by man in opposition to the system
established by God the Father.
- Conversion vs. Reconversion discusses
the significance of equitable conversion, being born again, in
reference to land and labor and living in God's Kingdom.
- Money vs. Mammon references the
fallacies and foolishness and the fiat character of the present
money systems as well as its origins and nature and why it has
delivered you into destitution and bondage.
- Trust vs. Faith expresses the
importance of faith in The LORD God and the traps, seductions
and dangers of trusting in lesser gods.
- Deported vs. Departed references
excommunication from the world systems and why it has been
desired throughout history even unto this day.
- The Charagma vs. The Card touches
on the concepts of the beast and the image of the beast as well
as the so called mark of the beast as it was used then and now.
[What is the mark and why you have it].
- The Body of Christ Vs. The Body of the
State looks at the Church, the State established by Jesus
the Christ, manditorially exempt from the control of man's
government and churches established under the State with strict
operational restrictions.
- This information was condensed from the book Covenants of the gods.
Information about Setting a record that you are married at Holy Matrimony
Establishing a Church according to the ways of Christ
Establishing a Ministry
 
---- |
